The Growing Difficulties with the In Vitro Fertilization Trained
The growing debate over stem cell research and other ethical battle in other scientific research as in vitro fertilization, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was recently awarded even Robert Edwards, 85, for his exemplary work in in vitro fertilization . Edwards, now a professor emeritus at the University of Cambridge in England, was responsible for the birth 30 years ago the first test tube baby. He is a biologist who get together a sperm and an egg in a laboratory dish, had it been subject to some procedures of scientific rigor and then implanted in the womb to become a healthy human baby nine months later.
While in vitro fertilization poses a degree of surprise to many and a level of achievement for many professional medical uniforms, there are still some issues that underlie the often controversial unanswered. Several articles can be read online on fertilization in vitro that the struggle for the triumph of the project is not experimental, but again their criticism mainly on the premise of ethics and morality. In an article published in Time magazine online, the problem has even legal attention as parents tried to sue a health trust to give them the wrong baby wrong sperm.
On October 14, 2010 a Time magazine article titled "Judgement on the wrong color children born after in vitro fertilization" the actions of a very peculiar case, presented to a Northern Ireland High Court. The judge refused to rule in favor of parents who accused a health trust is badly misused sperm through in vitro fertilization in two children whose skin color was darker than what they expected. The parents claimed that children were being discriminated against at school by the color of their skin.
In another story a bit involved in the same article, a woman from Arkansas said that legal battles with the control of the embryos created from eggs. She wanted the embryos to be implanted in her, but the law prohibits action without the consent of her husband. Unfortunately, embryos have also been created with the sperm of her husband and separated. Besides that, she and her husband had already paid for the custody of the embryos from 11 years ago will never be used unless both parties agree.
An online article in Popular Science also filed another story about IVF and this time focuses on the ethical and moral debates that have plagued scientists for the defense in medical uniforms for many years. The story was about a baby that was born from a frozen embryo for twenty years. The mother was 42 and now are having trouble conceiving. The embryo of the other party has been acquired in a heterosexual couple who had donated their embryos in 1990 after already successfully produced a child by in vitro fertilization. Extra embryos are being asked to freeze. This makes the issue more controversial because the embryo has been frozen at the same time, a child born in 1990. This raises a fact that the frozen embryos has a brother who is really old, and that is just born 20 years ago.
Although past history has no negative impact on security or economic stability of a country, proposes a quite unusual in terms of ethical considerations. The process can be used to retard the growth of the population in terms of contraceptive use, but by altering the normal process that must undergo an embryo which can delay their growth to reach a specific date to become human.
IVF is a truly remarkable medical breakthrough, but if handled irresponsibly can deliberately cause dangerous precedents.
Here, George writes about the problems arising from in vitro fertilization and how teachers of medical uniforms is to address them.
While in vitro fertilization poses a degree of surprise to many and a level of achievement for many professional medical uniforms, there are still some issues that underlie the often controversial unanswered. Several articles can be read online on fertilization in vitro that the struggle for the triumph of the project is not experimental, but again their criticism mainly on the premise of ethics and morality. In an article published in Time magazine online, the problem has even legal attention as parents tried to sue a health trust to give them the wrong baby wrong sperm.
On October 14, 2010 a Time magazine article titled "Judgement on the wrong color children born after in vitro fertilization" the actions of a very peculiar case, presented to a Northern Ireland High Court. The judge refused to rule in favor of parents who accused a health trust is badly misused sperm through in vitro fertilization in two children whose skin color was darker than what they expected. The parents claimed that children were being discriminated against at school by the color of their skin.
In another story a bit involved in the same article, a woman from Arkansas said that legal battles with the control of the embryos created from eggs. She wanted the embryos to be implanted in her, but the law prohibits action without the consent of her husband. Unfortunately, embryos have also been created with the sperm of her husband and separated. Besides that, she and her husband had already paid for the custody of the embryos from 11 years ago will never be used unless both parties agree.
An online article in Popular Science also filed another story about IVF and this time focuses on the ethical and moral debates that have plagued scientists for the defense in medical uniforms for many years. The story was about a baby that was born from a frozen embryo for twenty years. The mother was 42 and now are having trouble conceiving. The embryo of the other party has been acquired in a heterosexual couple who had donated their embryos in 1990 after already successfully produced a child by in vitro fertilization. Extra embryos are being asked to freeze. This makes the issue more controversial because the embryo has been frozen at the same time, a child born in 1990. This raises a fact that the frozen embryos has a brother who is really old, and that is just born 20 years ago.
Although past history has no negative impact on security or economic stability of a country, proposes a quite unusual in terms of ethical considerations. The process can be used to retard the growth of the population in terms of contraceptive use, but by altering the normal process that must undergo an embryo which can delay their growth to reach a specific date to become human.
IVF is a truly remarkable medical breakthrough, but if handled irresponsibly can deliberately cause dangerous precedents.
Here, George writes about the problems arising from in vitro fertilization and how teachers of medical uniforms is to address them.
See this Amp at http://bit.ly/pbG01O
Comments
Post a Comment